Search this site
Embedded Files
JLC
  • HOME
  • ABOUT THE JOURNAL
    • Journal of Language and Communication
    • Editorial Board Member (EBM)
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer-Review
  • SUBMISSION
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
  • REGULAR ISSUES
    • Vol. 12, No. 1, March 2025
    • Vol. 11, No. 2, September 2024
    • Vol. 11, No. 1, March 2024
    • Vol. 10, No. 2, September 2023
    • Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2023
    • Vol. 9, No. 2, September 2022
    • Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2022
    • Vol. 8, No. 2, September 2021
    • Vol. 8, No. 1, March 2021
    • Vol. 7, No. 2, September 2020
    • Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2020
    • Vol. 6, No. 2, September 2019
    • Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2019
    • Vol. 5, No. 2, September 2018
    • Vol. 5, No. 1, March 2018
    • Vol. 4, No. 2, September 2017
    • Vol. 4, No. 1, March 2017
    • Vol. 3, No. 2, September 2016
    • Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2016
    • Vol. 2, No. 2, September 2015
    • Vol. 2, No. 1, March 2015
    • Vol. 1, No. 2, September 2014
    • Vol. 1, No. 1, March 2014
  • ANNOUNCEMENT
  • CONTACT US
JLC

Vol. 11, No. 2, September 2024

THE PHONOLOGICAL AND PHONETIC STUDY OF EMPHATIC PITCH RANGE BY CHINESE EFL LEARNERS


Tian Qingbo

Universiti Putra Malaysia, Yuxi Normal University

Yap Ngee Thai

Universiti Putra Malaysia

Ng Chwee Fang

Universiti Putra Malaysia

Yasir Yahya

Universiti Putra Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/jlc.11.02.09

Keywords: Chinese EFL learners; emphatic pitch range; English proficiency; focus position; foreign-accented speech; phonological and phonetic perspectives

Abstract

In producing second language (L2) speech, L2 learners tend to deviate from its norms, resulting in foreign-accented speech. Pitch range plays a crucial role in the perception of foreign-accented speech. This study aims to investigate the production of emphatic pitch range in English by Chinese Learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) from both the phonological and phonetic perspectives. There were seven native English speakers and fourteen Chinese EFL learners participating in this study. They were required to read the second part of eighteen dialogue pairs loudly. Through linguistic measures of the recordings, the study found significant differences in three pitch range types between the native English speakers and the learners in the phonological perspective, which might be influenced by Chinese prosody. However, no significant differences were found in the phonetic perspective, which might be impacted by the learners’ native language. In addition, English proficiency did not influence the learners’ performance in the phonological and phonetic perspectives. This may be attributed to the homogeneity among the learners and the effect of their native language. Lastly, focus position significantly influenced the phonological performance of the learners in five pitch range types, which may be explained by multiple factors. However, the effect of focus position on the learners’ phonetic performance was limited to two pitch range types, which may be explained by the principle of least effort. 

See full article↗️


Published: 

2024-09-30 


Issue: 

Vol. 11, No. 2, September 2024

Copyright © 2025, FBMK_UPM. All Rights Reserved.  

Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Report abuse