Search this site
Embedded Files
JLC
  • HOME
  • ABOUT THE JOURNAL
    • Journal of Language and Communication
    • Editorial Board Member (EBM)
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer-Review
  • SUBMISSION
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
  • REGULAR ISSUES
    • Vol. 12, No. 1, March 2025
    • Vol. 11, No. 2, September 2024
    • Vol. 11, No. 1, March 2024
    • Vol. 10, No. 2, September 2023
    • Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2023
    • Vol. 9, No. 2, September 2022
    • Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2022
    • Vol. 8, No. 2, September 2021
    • Vol. 8, No. 1, March 2021
    • Vol. 7, No. 2, September 2020
    • Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2020
    • Vol. 6, No. 2, September 2019
    • Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2019
    • Vol. 5, No. 2, September 2018
    • Vol. 5, No. 1, March 2018
    • Vol. 4, No. 2, September 2017
    • Vol. 4, No. 1, March 2017
    • Vol. 3, No. 2, September 2016
    • Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2016
    • Vol. 2, No. 2, September 2015
    • Vol. 2, No. 1, March 2015
    • Vol. 1, No. 2, September 2014
    • Vol. 1, No. 1, March 2014
  • ANNOUNCEMENT
  • CONTACT US
JLC

Vol. 2, No. 2, September 2015

MALAYSIAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' ATTITUDE TOWARDS PLAGIARISM


Manjet Kaur Mehar Singh

Universiti Sains Malaysia


Keywords: academic integrity; attitude; academic misconduct; plagiarism; attitude; plagiarism; university student

Abstract

Plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty that affects the academic integrity of educational institutions worldwide. However, the need to curb plagiarism is immensely influenced by the lack of student understanding of what actually constitutes plagiarism. Thus, this study aims to explore Malaysian public university students' attitude towards plagiarism through a questionnaire survey among public university students in Malaysia. The findings highlight that the students were not aware that certain activities they considered as non-plagiarism actually constitute some form of plagiarism and vice versa. The study provided evidence that a significant proportion of the students had engaged in plagiarism activities to a certain degree. Students also looked forward for more lenient penalties by the university if they were found to have plagiarized. The findings have significant implications for educators if they intend to improve the detection and punishment of plagiarism to educate potential perpetrators.

See full article↗️


Published: 

04-09-2015


Issue: 

Vol. 2, No. 2, September 2015

Copyright © 2025, FBMK_UPM. All Rights Reserved.  

Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Report abuse