Search this site
Embedded Files
JLC
  • HOME
  • ABOUT THE JOURNAL
    • Journal of Language and Communication
    • Editorial Board Member (EBM)
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer-Review
  • SUBMISSION
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
  • REGULAR ISSUES
    • Vol. 12, No. 1, March 2025
    • Vol. 11, No. 2, September 2024
    • Vol. 11, No. 1, March 2024
    • Vol. 10, No. 2, September 2023
    • Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2023
    • Vol. 9, No. 2, September 2022
    • Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2022
    • Vol. 8, No. 2, September 2021
    • Vol. 8, No. 1, March 2021
    • Vol. 7, No. 2, September 2020
    • Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2020
    • Vol. 6, No. 2, September 2019
    • Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2019
    • Vol. 5, No. 2, September 2018
    • Vol. 5, No. 1, March 2018
    • Vol. 4, No. 2, September 2017
    • Vol. 4, No. 1, March 2017
    • Vol. 3, No. 2, September 2016
    • Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2016
    • Vol. 2, No. 2, September 2015
    • Vol. 2, No. 1, March 2015
    • Vol. 1, No. 2, September 2014
    • Vol. 1, No. 1, March 2014
  • ANNOUNCEMENT
  • CONTACT US
JLC

Vol. 8, No. 2, September 2021

SOCIAL CATEGORIES IN INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION: MALAYSIAN AND INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS’INTERACTIONS


Sue Lyn Ong

Multimedia University

Shanta Nair Venugopal

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia


Keywords: intercultural communication; social categories; rapport management; face; politeness

Abstract

Foregrounding Intercultural Communication (Gudykunst & Kim 1997; Jandt 2010; Martin & Nakayama 2013, 2014; Nair-Venugopal 2003, 2009, 2015), this paper presents the results of examining the influence of the specific social categories of age, gender, nationality, ethnicity, religion, mother tongue, and English language ability on the formation of self-selected groups and group work interactions of students in a private Malaysian university.  An interpretive framework was used to highlight how these social categories influenced the face-work (Goffman 1967) and politeness (Brown & Levinson 1987) strategies employed to manage rapport (Spencer-Oatey 2008, 2009) in order to achieve successful group work.  The study involved a total of 193 culturally diverse students in the Faculty of Management in the private university. Using an ethnographic approach, the participants were observed during group work sessions and the interactions audio-taped. The data corpus comprised transcripts of audio-taped recordings, close-ended survey questions, self-reports from post-hoc interviews, feedback from expert informants and field-notes from direct participant observations.  The study found that age and English language ability are significantly influential in the formation of self-selected groups, while age, gender, mother tongue, and English language ability were salient and influential in face-to-face group work interactions.

See full article↗️


Published: 

30-09-2021 


Issue: 

Vol. 8, No. 2, September 2021

Copyright © 2025, FBMK_UPM. All Rights Reserved.  

Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Report abuse